|
|
Post by chuna on May 17, 2009 17:48:52 GMT 7
Yeah, well, Marik knows you.
It's like her and her other-year friends know you too. It's...weird.
|
|
|
|
Post by TiniWini on Jan 19, 2010 12:46:36 GMT 7
It's not weird... I just... Know a lot of people. XD
Which reminds me... I haven't been to SPCP since my bestfriend graduated. Meh...
Anyways... Any other question? Something that's not about my sexuality?
|
|
|
|
Post by Blessed Devil on Jan 22, 2010 9:13:40 GMT 7
Do you think gay sex is an abomination?! XD
Technically, that's not about YOUR sexuality. Unless you're gay.
|
|
|
|
Post by TiniWini on Jan 29, 2010 23:11:57 GMT 7
Okay, and as such, I will answer it.
No, I don't think it's an abomination, though I can't seem to imagine how gay sex is possible. I just can't picture it. While I don't think it's an abomination, I think it's stupid, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blessed Devil on Jan 30, 2010 12:38:01 GMT 7
Gay sex is possible in the ass, of course. But why do you think it's stupid?
|
|
|
|
Post by TiniWini on Jan 30, 2010 14:02:33 GMT 7
I just don't see the point to it. For me, sex isn't just for pleasure. It's something more... Sacred and holy. And if nothing happens after that, like reproducing, it's downright pointless, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blessed Devil on Jan 30, 2010 23:39:55 GMT 7
Ah, so you are against the use of condoms, then? Or anything that would help us experience the pleasure of sex without having to worry about impregnating someone?
|
|
|
|
Post by TiniWini on Jan 31, 2010 14:49:41 GMT 7
I've never really been proud of having to use one, that's what I'm gonna say. I've used them before, but I dislike using them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blessed Devil on Jan 31, 2010 15:32:28 GMT 7
Hmm... Wait, so couples shouldn't have sex if it's just for pleasure, am I right? Because, for some reason, sex is divine to you. Is there any reason why you think this way?
|
|
|
|
Post by TiniWini on Feb 1, 2010 16:59:50 GMT 7
Sex is divine, it is sacred. Though I couldn't say I haven't done it for pleasure, I just think the pleasure part should be moderated, at best, lest you get addicted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blessed Devil on Feb 1, 2010 21:25:19 GMT 7
I don't understand. Now you're saying that sex for pleasure is okay as long as you don't get addicted to it. But 4 posts before that, you were saying that sex for pleasure is "downright pointless".
Also, how did you come to the conclusion that sex is so divine that you discourage doing it for pleasure? I'm sorry for repeating the question, but "Sex is divine, it is sacred" didn't really answer the question.
|
|
|
|
Post by TiniWini on Feb 2, 2010 3:40:59 GMT 7
Sorry bout that. I was a bit drunk. XD
Anyways, I'll have to take everything I said earlier and just give this answer.
It depends on the persons doing it. Konsensya na lang, kumbaga. I still believe that the main purpose of sexual intercourse is to reproduce and not to pleasure one another.
If one serves the purpose of having sex to reproduce, then the pleasure is merely just a bonus.
Furthermore, using condoms or contraceptive items would defeat the main and real purpose of having sex. That's what I meant to say in my previous posts.
BUT!
On the other hand, anyone is free to do as he/she wishes. I wouldn't care so much if other people violate the sacredness of sexual intercourse. All I'm saying is that it is and it should be regarded as one of the most sacred things man or any living creature could and would ever do in his/her life.
Though I do admit, I've had sex for pleasure in the past. But last Christmas, I have come to a conclusion that what I did was wrong. I might do it again in the future, but I will always come back to this conclusion that it's wrong and pointless if I'm not going to make a baby. XD
I stand by this post of mine, and no longer the previous posts regarding this topic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blessed Devil on Feb 6, 2010 18:19:26 GMT 7
How do you know that the one sole purpose of sex is reproduction and never anything else?
|
|
|
|
Post by TiniWini on Feb 7, 2010 8:16:23 GMT 7
My religion states it as so, therefore, as a member of that religion, I should withhold and enforce the beliefs, no matter how farfetched or ridiculous they are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blessed Devil on Feb 8, 2010 21:18:12 GMT 7
Basically, what you said (in different words) is this:
"A bunch of people who lived thousands of years ago said that sex for pleasure is evil. I believe them even though it's stupid."
|
|
|
|
Post by J e e c o . on Feb 26, 2010 10:32:54 GMT 7
Well there is also the unitive purpose of sex. o.o That's why PMS is wrong. Sex is something only two people bound together by marriage, in the light of love, to do. It's a sort of giving and taking that's something more than mere physical pleasure. =_= Also, on the reproductive part- well, the Christian family is made up of authentic love. You can't make babies lest you want them, and you're ready for them, to love them.
That's what my teacher says, anyway.
In the light of gay sex- well, there are homosexuals out there who love more than they want pleasure, and isn't sex like a greater way of saying you love someone truthfully- disregarding all other pleasure-seekers, of course. I don't think it's an abomination. I think it's sweet. Gay people are not pedophile sex monsters, as the people thought they were years back. >.>
|
|
|
|
Post by TiniWini on Mar 2, 2010 4:44:48 GMT 7
Gay people are not pedophile sex monsters, But... They are in shota yaoi manga, rite? XD |
|
|
|
Post by J e e c o . on Mar 30, 2010 23:57:39 GMT 7
SITUATIONS ARE IRRELVANT NOW , x  x  THE FRUSTRATION, IT'S A REGULAR THING ! Listening to: Oh, nothing.
--
Oh lol, Martin. Yaoi manga -- shota manga -- is only manga. XD I don't think they're like that in real life.
Unless they really are and I've been fighting against the wrong side since. D8
--
[/size][/blockquote][/blockquote][/blockquote] I HATE THE ONES WHO LOVE TO HATE [/size][/font] ![/center] |
|
|
|
Post by Blessed Devil on Mar 31, 2010 15:49:50 GMT 7
PMS is wrong. Sex is something only two people bound together by marriage, in the light of love, to do. Are you the authority on sex? *raises eyebrow* Who gave you or your teacher the right to declare the "real" purpose of sex? =_= Also, on the reproductive part- well, the Christian family is made up of authentic love. You can't make babies lest you want them, and you're ready for them, to love them. Sex doesn't have to make babies. In the light of gay sex- well, there are homosexuals out there who love more than they want pleasure, and isn't sex like a greater way of saying you love someone truthfully- disregarding all other pleasure-seekers, of course. I don't think it's an abomination. I think it's sweet. Gay people are not pedophile sex monsters, as the people thought they were years back. >.> I agree with this. Sex is a greater way of telling someone how much you love them. |
|
|
|
Post by J e e c o . on Mar 31, 2010 16:19:19 GMT 7
It's a shit box, sky box, sex box kinda world ,x x Lucky if you float, wade and stream ! Listening to: On My Way ;;Billy Boy on Poison.
--
Whaat. I've never been an authority over anything. =_= I'm just saying what my teacher said. He's a Jesuit brother, go figure. I thought it'd be fun to say stuff like that because I just came home from my oral exams that day. 
So anyway.
SEX isn't for babies. IT'S FOR LOVE. But people need to do it to get babies if they want them. That's my point.
WOOOOOOH.
--
[/size][/blockquote][/blockquote][/blockquote] Cause every NICE young girl [/size][/font] --x x needs an ANGRY young man[/size][/font] ![/center] |
|
